Skip to main content

2002

The Sweetest Thing

"Sugar, spice, and a very unfortunate piercing."

The Sweetest Thing poster
  • 84 minutes
  • Directed by Roger Kumble
  • Cameron Diaz, Christina Applegate, Selma Blair

⏱ 5-minute read

The early 2000s were a lawless wasteland for the romantic comedy. We were caught in this strange transitional period where the gloss of the 90s hadn't quite worn off, but the Judd Apatow-led era of "mumblecore" and improvised raunch hadn't yet arrived. In the middle of this identity crisis sat The Sweetest Thing, a movie that was marketed as a fluffy Cameron Diaz vehicle but possessed the soul of a frat-house dare. It’s a film that asks the question: "What if we took three of the most charming actresses in Hollywood and forced them to navigate a plot consisting almost entirely of bodily fluids and fashion emergencies?"

Scene from The Sweetest Thing

I recently revisited this on a flight where the person in the middle seat was aggressively clipping their cuticles, and honestly, the sheer chaos on my screen was the only thing keeping me sane. It is a loud, messy, and frequently bizarre artifact of Y2K cinema that deserves a second look, if only to marvel at how much the industry has changed.

The Anti-Rom-Com in Rom-Com Clothing

On paper, the plot is standard fare. Christina (Cameron Diaz) is a "player" who meets the perfect guy, Peter (Thomas Jane), at a club, loses him, and goes on a road trip with her best friend Courtney (Christina Applegate) to find him. But the script, penned by South Park writer Nancy M. Pimental, has absolutely no interest in being sweet. It’s a series of vignettes held together by the chemistry of its leads and a reckless commitment to the bit.

The film’s greatest strength is that it actually feels like it was written by people who like women. There is a lived-in, frantic energy to the friendship between Diaz, Applegate, and Selma Blair (who plays their put-upon friend Jane). They talk over each other, they have "the floor" for emergencies, and they are frequently, unapologetically disgusting. In 2002, critics didn't know what to do with this. The movie treats a glory hole accident like a spiritual awakening, and at the time, that was a bridge too far for a genre that usually ended with a kiss in the rain. Looking back, it feels like a precursor to Bridesmaids, just without the narrative discipline.

A Time Capsule of Low-Rise Jeans and DVD Extras

Scene from The Sweetest Thing

Watching The Sweetest Thing now is a sensory overload of 2002 aesthetics. We’re talking about an era where the wardrobe department clearly had a vendetta against the concept of a midriff. The fashion is so aggressive it’s practically a character itself. But beyond the clothes, the film represents the peak of "DVD Culture." This was back when studios realized they could sell a movie twice by releasing an "Unrated" version with four extra minutes of dirty jokes.

The behind-the-scenes trivia reveals that a lot of the film's most infamous moments—like the choreographed "Penis Song" in the restaurant—were born out of the cast’s off-screen rapport. Roger Kumble, who had previously directed the sleek and cynical Cruel Intentions, let the cameras roll while the girls improvised. You can see Jason Bateman (playing Peter’s brother) and a pre-fame Parker Posey leaning into the absurdity. It’s fascinating to see Jason Bateman here; he’s playing the "douchey brother" archetype before Arrested Development completely reinvented his screen persona as the weary straight man.

Why It Vanished Into the Bargain Bin

Despite a decent box office return, the film largely disappeared from the cultural conversation. Why? Because it’s a "mood" movie rather than a "story" movie. It’s a collection of loosely connected sketches—the dressing room montage, the dry-cleaning incident, the aforementioned piercing disaster—that don't always add up to a satisfying whole. It’s a movie that prioritizes a gag about a maggoty motel room over actual character development for Thomas Jane.

Scene from The Sweetest Thing

However, there’s something undeniably refreshing about its lack of stakes. In the post-9/11 landscape, there was a brief window where we just wanted to see movie stars being idiots. It doesn’t try to be "The Definitive Statement on Modern Love." It just wants to show you Selma Blair getting her face stuck in a very awkward position while Christina Applegate tries to help using only a flashlight and a prayer. It’s an R-rated cartoon.

The cinematography by Anthony B. Richmond (who shot Don't Look Now, believe it or not) is surprisingly bright and vibrant, capturing the neon-soaked clubs and sun-drenched California highways with a high-budget sheen that indie comedies of today often lack. It’s a "big" movie that feels very small, which is a rare combination.

6.5 /10

Worth Seeing

The Sweetest Thing isn't a forgotten masterpiece, but it is a fascinating, high-energy anomaly. It captures three A-list stars at the height of their powers, having a blast in a movie that is frequently dumber than they are. It’s the cinematic equivalent of a neon-colored cocktail: it’s mostly sugar and air, but it’ll definitely give you a buzz. If you’re tired of the sanitized, algorithm-friendly rom-coms of the streaming era, this messy, raunchy trip down memory lane is exactly the palate cleanser you need. Just maybe don't watch it with your parents.

Scene from The Sweetest Thing Scene from The Sweetest Thing

Keep Exploring...